This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Insights Insights
| 1 minute read

Therapies that Try to Uncover Memories of Abuse May be Counterproductive

One long-running controversy in treatment of people who have suffered from childhood abuse is whether and how much to delve into their memories of the abuse. In a recent study, researchers uncovered indications that people who don’t remember abuse, or at lest don’t report it to interviewers, have better mental health than those who do. It’s only one study, but it does suggest that people who don’t make the abuse a central part of their self-narrative tend  to have better mental health over time.

The researchers interviewed almost 1200 adults over 15 years, looking at their mental health status in areas such as depression and anxiety. The adults did not know that the researchers had deliberately chosen more than half of them from documented official records showing that they had suffered childhood abuse. Of that group, more than 2/3 reported the abuse and higher levels of anxiety and depression than the control group. The 252 adults who reported abuse, but whose records showed no objective findings, also reported high levels of abuse. But the 173 people who did NOT report abuse, despite court records showing they had suffered from it, reported no more anxiety or depression than the general population.

The researchers caution that this study is small and does not support any sweeping generalizations. But it is a data point that evidence-based treaters should note. As one of the study’s co-authors pointed out, the study may indicate that therapies that seek to uncover repressed memories are counterproductive. “But [Dr. Danese] cautioned that the results of the study should not be interpreted as endorsing the avoidance of distressing memories, which could make them ‘scarier’ in the long term. Instead, they point to the promise of therapies that seek to “reorganize” and moderate memories.”

Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist not involved in the study who has long been skeptical of the reliability of memories of abuse, “noted that the study stops short of another conclusion that could be supported by the data: Forgetting about abuse might be a healthy response.  ‘They could have said, people who don’t remember in some ways are better off, and maybe you don’t want to tamper with them,’ she said.“

This study alone will not support that conclusion. But it is in line with other studies showing that people who avoid making victimization the center of their identity have better mental health outcomes. Mental health professions who work in this field, and lawyers who hire experts, should keep this study in their libraries.

But even considering these caveats, he said, it was notable that adults who had a documented history of having been abused but did not report it — because they had no memory of the events, interpreted them differently or chose not to share those memories with interviewers — seemed healthier. “If the meaning you give to these experiences is not central to how you remember your childhood so you don’t feel like you need to report it, then you are more likely to have better mental health over time,” he said.

Tags

child abuse, mental health research, ausburn_deborah, youth services law, insights